+5
In reply to:
Joel Grus 🤠
@joelgrus
·
512d
The statement by @joelgrus engages in public discourse by addressing the nature of corporate communications and the reliability of AI technologies. The conversation critiques the promotional tactics of Salesforce and the performance of Microsoft's AI, contributing to a broader discussion on the efficacy and marketing of AI solutions.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a critique of corporate practices, which is a legitimate area of public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on corporate actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the nature of corporate reports and advertisements, the statement promotes critical thinking and understanding of marketing practices. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Salesforce's marketing tactics without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight issues in corporate communication and AI technology, contributing to the betterment of public understanding. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.