Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
512d
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
512d
Joel Grus 🤠
@joelgrus
·
512d
The statement by @joelgrus ('Or this one etc') is a continuation of a conversation about the reliability and performance of AI technologies, specifically Microsoft's AI. The conversation involves critiques and comparisons of AI products from different companies, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to technology and corporate responsibility. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, focusing on the perceived shortcomings of Microsoft's AI.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a critical discussion about AI technologies.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on corporate entities and their products. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss the performance and reliability of AI technologies, which is relevant to public interest. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.