Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
9/4/2024, 8:53:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Reid Southen
@Rahll
·
512d
@Whinger1973 @AKJ_N5T @ednewtonrex @ChombaBupe @timnitGebru @GaryMarcus @ravenben Does someone need to commit a burglary to have an opinion on it? Give me a break.
Asshole Detectorist
@Whinger1973
·
512d
@AKJ_N5T @Rahll @ednewtonrex @ChombaBupe @timnitGebru @GaryMarcus @ravenben Oh, I found plenty of them. My point is none of them that I chatted with had any experience with AI at all.
LostAKJ
@AKJ_N5T
·
512d
@Whinger1973 @Rahll @ednewtonrex @ChombaBupe @timnitGebru @GaryMarcus @ravenben My point is that many writers overwhelmingly voiced their strong opposition to this tech and you can't seem to find any of them
Asshole Detectorist
@Whinger1973
·
512d
@AKJ_N5T @Rahll @ednewtonrex @ChombaBupe @timnitGebru @GaryMarcus @ravenben I certainly did, what's your point?
LostAKJ
@AKJ_N5T
·
512d
@Whinger1973 @Rahll @ednewtonrex @ChombaBupe @timnitGebru @GaryMarcus @ravenben ok so you didn't see the NaNoWriMo stuff
Asshole Detectorist
@Whinger1973
·
512d
@Rahll @AKJ_N5T @ednewtonrex @ChombaBupe @timnitGebru @GaryMarcus @ravenben And you're defending the concept that people who have no knowledge of a subject have the right to condemn it on a public forum and somehow be respected for that.

The statement 'Reid, this person simply is not worth your time.' is part of a larger conversation about the legitimacy of opinions on AI technology, particularly from those without direct experience. The tone is dismissive and suggests that engaging with the person in question is not valuable. The intent appears to be to dissuade Reid from continuing the discussion with the individual mentioned.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive nature could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does dismiss the dignity of the person being referred to. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not promote constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it dismisses the other person's worthiness of engagement, which can be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]