Gary Marcus

The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the spread of misinformation and potential foreign influence in social media. The tone is critical and somewhat accusatory, with elements of sarcasm and frustration. The statement touches on several principles, including the potential harm of misinformation, respect for others, and the promotion of understanding.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement highlights the potential harm caused by misinformation, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone and the mention of physical abnormalities ('don’t even have normal numbers of fingers') could be seen as harmful and disrespectful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, particularly with the mention of physical characteristics and the implication of foreign funding without clear evidence. This violates the principle of respecting others. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a mocking tone and makes unverified claims, which can contribute to division rather than understanding. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly with the mention of physical characteristics and the implication of foreign funding. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]