Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
9/4/2024, 9:02:48 PM
X
In reply to:
ふくろう
@LifeInSVwithEVs
·
512d
@GaryMarcus I think most of sane people have already left for other platforms.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
512d
Community Notes is broken. X is broken. The person posting this [10M views] appears to be funded by the Russian government & people in the picture don’t even have normal numbers of fingers.

Nobody here even cares anymore. Genuinely sad.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
512d
Dude apparently funded by Russia spreads misinformation; gets nearly 10M views on X.

The statement and the preceding conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the integrity of information on social media platforms, the influence of foreign entities, and political endorsements. The tone of the conversation is critical and somewhat dismissive, reflecting frustration with perceived misinformation and platform issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and preceding conversation express frustration with misinformation and platform issues, which can be seen as an attempt to highlight and address potential harm caused by false information. However, the dismissive tone and lack of constructive solutions may not fully align with the principle of striving to do no harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy of individuals by not revealing personal information, but it does engage in a form of public shaming by calling out specific posts and individuals, which could be seen as a violation of dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticism and frustration, which may not foster a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in criticism but does not offer constructive solutions or engage in dialogue with those in disagreement. The tone is more accusatory than collaborative. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The conversation uses its platform to highlight issues of misinformation and platform integrity, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the approach is more critical than solution-oriented. [+1]