Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
9/5/2024, 2:51:32 AM
X
In reply to:
andmar74馃嚛馃嚢馃敪馃殌馃鈻讹笍馃惂
@andmar74
路
506d
@GaryMarcus AI can't do text that well. The image looks real to me.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
506d
The oddities in this photo keep mounting.
ThomasB
@thomas_brooke_
路
506d
@karmacondon @WaseemWtesqie @GaryMarcus I just took it for real until I saw Gary's post. Looking further, the younger woman in front, I can see fingernail polish on one hand but not the other. And esp look at her neck, too. And then also look at her neck compared to the matriarch. Still challenging for me but suspect.

The statement and the images provided are part of a broader conversation about the authenticity of an image and the capabilities of AI in generating text within images. The statement by @andmar74 appears to be a critique of another user's attempt to generate text using AI, suggesting that high-frequency text isn't necessarily problematic. The images provided are examples of AI-generated text on t-shirts supporting a political figure, which ties into the discussion about AI's ability to create realistic text in images.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a critique of AI capabilities rather than a personal attack.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the technical aspect of AI-generated text rather than individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a technical discussion about AI capabilities.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI's text generation capabilities without resorting to personal attacks.聽[+1]