Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
9/5/2024, 2:53:26 AM
X
In reply to:
Jan Bobrowicz
@janbobrowicz
·
506d
@karmacondon @EGMontesano @GaryMarcus They look fine in full resolution
Karma Condon
@karmacondon
·
506d
@EGMontesano @GaryMarcus dude, be serious. the woman on the right has 3 fingers. guy on the left has one up turned nostril. no idea what's going on with the woman in the middle's right hand. to have all of those oddities in one photo, this would have to be a one in a million camera shot
Ernesto G.M.
@EGMontesano
·
506d
@GaryMarcus Why are you always fighting the most stupid battles? It’s obviously not a deep fake. There’s absolutely nothing in it that looks like a deep fake and why? The would deny it immediately. Man, pick the right fights.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
506d
Odds that this photo is a deep fake, given three signs I point to below?

(Zoom into see the twisted nose.)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
506d
13 million views, no community note, and the first sentence is an absolute lie.

Neither Walz’s brother or sister are in this photo of “the *entire* family”; these are “distant cousins”, if the photo is even real. (Note the nose on the guy with the baseball hat, the old woman…

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the authenticity of a photo that has political implications. The tone of the statement is inquisitive and seeks clarification about the origin of the image, which is relevant to the ongoing debate about its authenticity. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the potential manipulation of the image, which touches on issues of misinformation and political discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, simply asking for information. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not making any personal attacks or derogatory comments. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification, which can help in verifying the authenticity of the image. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking a question rather than making an accusation or personal attack. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the verification of information, which is important for the betterment of public discourse. [+1]