In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
506d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
506d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the societal implications of generative AI, a public issue. The reply by @olivia_p_walker and the subsequent reply by @GaryMarcus also contribute to this discourse by addressing the nature of their disagreement and the manner in which they engage with each other.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus does not appear to do harm with words and actions. It acknowledges disagreement but does not escalate the conflict. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement by @GaryMarcus promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging @olivia_p_walker's gentleness and kindness despite their disagreements. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue and avoids personal attacks, focusing instead on the nature of their interaction and the broader issue at hand. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.