In reply to:
Fernando Blanco 🦋 ✂️🍕
@FBpsy
·
503d
Prof. Evelina Leivada
@EvelinaLeivada
·
503d
Prof. Evelina Leivada
@EvelinaLeivada
·
503d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in understanding and interpreting human language, specifically in the context of 'leet speak.' The tone is critical and challenges the effectiveness of LLMs by suggesting that the examples provided are likely part of the training set, implying a lack of originality in the model's responses.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of a technology rather than an individual or group.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the performance of LLMs rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging the use of original items to test the capabilities of LLMs, which can lead to a better understanding of their limitations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a way to improve the evaluation of LLMs, rather than resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.