Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 103
9/8/2024, 3:08:18 AM
X
In reply to:
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
@FairmountJack I have already generated at least 40 pictures, each violating multiple copyrights, and a picture of Garfield with big honkers. I shall be a burden on the system itself
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
@FairmountJack Been using it to get to DM people I need to for the show and annoyed about it. Intend to generate enough images on grok to make it unprofitable and will spend - and itemise - spending any creator fund money on one of many burger meals and the rest to the trevor project
J
@FairmountJack
·
314d
@edzitron Ed. Come on. Checkmark?
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
Hi. It's your friends here at Hello Fresh. We're desperate. 200 meals for $2. We will put it away in your fridge. We will become your staff and run your household. We will do anything for your business. Anything. Just ask. We lose $20bn an hour but we are an essential service

The statement in question constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of copyright infringement in the context of generative AI technologies like Midjourney and DALL-E 3. The linked article and the conversation it is part of address the ethical and legal implications of AI-generated content, which are significant societal concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a potential harm (copyright infringement) associated with generative AI. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By sharing an informative article, the statement promotes understanding and awareness about the issue of visual plagiarism in AI. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on the issue at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about a societal issue, contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public about an important issue. [+2]