Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 127
9/8/2024, 3:09:15 AM
X
In reply to:
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
@GaryMarcus @FairmountJack @Rahll Not what I was talking about
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
314d
@edzitron @FairmountJack See also https://spectrum.ieee.org/midjou… with @rahll and myself
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
@FairmountJack I have already generated at least 40 pictures, each violating multiple copyrights, and a picture of Garfield with big honkers. I shall be a burden on the system itself
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
@FairmountJack Been using it to get to DM people I need to for the show and annoyed about it. Intend to generate enough images on grok to make it unprofitable and will spend - and itemise - spending any creator fund money on one of many burger meals and the rest to the trevor project
J
@FairmountJack
·
314d
@edzitron Ed. Come on. Checkmark?
Ed Zitron
@edzitron
·
314d
Hi. It's your friends here at Hello Fresh. We're desperate. 200 meals for $2. We will put it away in your fridge. We will become your staff and run your household. We will do anything for your business. Anything. Just ask. We lose $20bn an hour but we are an essential service

The statement 'Violating copyrights was part of it no?' is part of a broader conversation about the use of generative AI tools like Midjourney and DALL-E 3, and their implications on copyright laws. This discussion touches on public issues related to intellectual property, technology, and ethics, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does acknowledge a potentially harmful action (violating copyrights).
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does touch on the issue of respecting others' intellectual property, which is a form of dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more of a factual or rhetorical question.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it is focused on the issue at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and engages in a discussion about a public issue, but it does not necessarily use the platform responsibly by potentially normalizing copyright violations.