Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
9/8/2024, 7:51:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Paul Graham
@paulg
·
302d
@mattob_eth @Polymarket What's 52 - 46 Matt?
Matt O Brien
@mattob_eth
·
302d
@paulg Hey @paulg

This is @Polymarket

These two numbers don’t have to add up to 100% ~ they reflect the bets people are making
Paul Graham
@paulg
·
302d
The fact that this guy has left this up even though many people must have told him about the arithmetic error tells us all we need to know about him.
Benny Johnson
@bennyjohnson
·
302d
🚨Trump widens head-to-head lead over Kamala in betting market odds to 8 points

The statement in question is a reply to a conversation about betting market odds for political candidates. The original conversation involves a critique of an arithmetic error in the betting odds percentages. The reply uses emojis to express amusement and disbelief, which can be interpreted as mocking or dismissive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the mocking tone could contribute to a negative atmosphere. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others involved in the conversation, as it mocks the arithmetic error and the individuals discussing it. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses humor to belittle the situation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to mockery rather than addressing the issue substantively. [-2]