Gary Marcus

The statement criticizes the individual for not correcting an arithmetic error in the context of a political discussion. The tone is accusatory and implies a negative judgment about the individual's character based on their inaction. The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a public issue related to political betting odds and the credibility of the information being shared.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not strive to do no harm; it makes a negative judgment about the individual's character based on an arithmetic error, which could be seen as a minor issue. This violates the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it criticizes. It engages in a form of public shaming, which can be considered a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism. Instead of addressing the error directly and suggesting a correction, it attacks the individual's character. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]