The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue, namely the credibility and fitness of a former U.S. President, Donald Trump, based on the opinions of his former cabinet members and inner circle. The statement also references a poll and a political ad, both of which are relevant to public debate and civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions. It raises a question about the credibility of Trump based on the opinions of his former associates, which is a legitimate public concern. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on public figures and their public actions and statements. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a discussion about the credibility of Trump based on the views of his former associates. However, it could be seen as lacking in empathy and compassion towards Trump and his supporters.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the credibility of Trump based on the opinions of his former associates. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a substantive public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.