Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 55
9/10/2024, 12:38:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Erik Brynjolfsson
@erikbryn
·
270d
@GaryMarcus @ylecun @Yoshua_Bengio @fchollet @demishassabis Who else should we ask?
Erik Brynjolfsson
@erikbryn
·
270d
@GaryMarcus @ylecun @Yoshua_Bengio @fchollet @demishassabis I’d love to get your perspective as well, Gary. What do you think?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
270d
@erikbryn @ylecun @Yoshua_Bengio @fchollet @demishassabis Good thing you didn’t ask a cognitive psychologist or expert in creativity research.
Erik Brynjolfsson
@erikbryn
·
270d
What do @ylecun, @Yoshua_Bengio, @fchollet and @demishassabis think of this finding?

“blind reviews of both LLM and human ideas…find LLM-generated ideas are judged as more novel (p < 0.05) than human expert ideas.”

http://www.arxiv.org/abs/2409.04…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue related to cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and the evaluation of machine-generated ideas versus human creativity. The tone is professional and aims to contribute to an ongoing academic discussion by providing additional resources and studies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is informative and contributes positively to the discussion. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by sharing relevant studies and suggesting experts who might contribute to the discussion. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing additional information and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]