In reply to:
Erik Brynjolfsson
@erikbryn
·
270d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
270d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue related to the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in generating novel research ideas. The conversation involves notable figures in the field of artificial intelligence and cognitive science, discussing the implications of recent studies and findings.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a professional and respectful engagement with the topic. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing a specific study and providing a link for further reading. It encourages a deeper look into the methods and findings, fostering an informed discussion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a request for perspective and referencing relevant examples. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to an informed and respectful discussion on a significant topic in the field of AI. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.