In reply to:
Brian Roemmele
@BrianRoemmele
·
247d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the accountability of social media platforms and the role of public figures in shaping discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it dismisses the other person's viewpoint without constructive engagement. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the other person's viewpoint without providing substantive counterarguments, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. While it is within the bounds of free speech, the dismissive tone does not contribute positively to public discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.