Brian Roemmele
@BrianRoemmele
·
244d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the interpretation of comments made by public figures and the role of science in society.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the use of 'utterly ludicrous' could be seen as dismissive and potentially harmful to the dignity of the person being criticized. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone towards @brianRoemmele could be seen as lacking respect for his dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying what Harari actually said, but the dismissive tone towards @brianRoemmele detracts from promoting empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be seen as a personal attack by calling the comment 'utterly ludicrous.' It does not fully engage in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to clarify a public issue, but the tone could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.