The statement 'The OpenAI exodus continues. In a normal climate, investors would be concerned.' refers to a broader trend of employees leaving OpenAI, which can be considered a public issue as it touches upon the stability and future of a significant organization in the tech industry. The statement by @alex_conneau about starting a new company after leaving OpenAI adds context to this trend.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a negative situation at OpenAI, which could be seen as indirectly harmful.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
[+1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on highlighting a negative trend.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it is a general observation about a trend.
[+1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to highlight a potential issue within a significant organization, which could be seen as contributing to public awareness.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss a relevant public issue responsibly.
[+1]