The statement 'The OpenAI exodus continues. In a normal climate, investors would be concerned.' refers to a broader trend of employees leaving OpenAI, which can be considered a public issue as it touches upon the stability and future of a significant organization in the tech industry. The statement by @alex_conneau about starting a new company after leaving OpenAI adds context to this trend.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a negative situation at OpenAI, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on highlighting a negative trend.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it is a general observation about a trend. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a potential issue within a significant organization, which could be seen as contributing to public awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss a relevant public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.