The statement emphasizes the importance of discussing AI policy in political debates, highlighting its potential impact on various societal issues such as fraud, disinformation, market manipulation, racism, and nonconsensual deep fake pornography. The tone is critical and somewhat skeptical about the likelihood of candidates addressing these issues adequately.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the importance of AI policy and its potential societal impacts, which is a constructive approach. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by addressing societal issues without targeting individuals or engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the potential harms of AI, especially towards vulnerable populations like teenage girls. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by expressing skepticism about the candidates' willingness to address AI policy, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for the betterment of society by urging attention to AI policy, which is a significant public concern. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.