The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue, namely the influence of foreign actors in public opinion and the political stance of former Vice Presidents regarding Donald Trump. The tone is dismissive and accusatory, suggesting that certain individuals are 'paid Russian assets' and implying that their opinions are not genuine but rather influenced by external forces.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it accuses individuals of being 'paid Russian assets' without evidence, which can be harmful and defamatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it engages in a form of cyberbullying by labeling people as 'paid Russian assets.' (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it dismisses opposing views without attempting to understand or engage with them. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments by calling people 'paid Russian assets.' (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes serious accusations without evidence. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.