Gary Marcus

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -59

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing a significant issue related to free speech and political commentary. The statement questions whether a prominent advocate for free speech will intervene in a situation where late-night hosts are allegedly being targeted by a political figure. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat provocative, aiming to draw attention to the issue of free speech and political retaliation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but raises a concern about potential harm to free speech, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public figures and a public issue without engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning the involvement of a free speech advocate, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards the issue of free speech, aligning with the principle of using words to promote understanding. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by raising a question rather than making a personal attack, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant societal issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the potential threat to it and questioning the involvement of a known advocate, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech responsibly. [+1]