Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the valuation of OpenAI in comparison to other companies, including Amazon and Tesla, and raises questions about the financial metrics used to justify such valuations. The tone is analytical and critical, aiming to provide a perspective on the financial viability and market expectations of tech companies.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm and is focused on financial analysis rather than personal attacks, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by providing a comparative analysis of company valuations, which can help others understand the financial landscape of tech companies. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the high valuation of OpenAI without making personal attacks, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to discuss a significant financial issue, contributing to the betterment of society by fostering informed discussions about market valuations. [+1]