Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 90

The statement by @BTCCryptoBlock and the reply by @GaryMarcus both constitute public discourse as they engage in a discussion about a significant public event (9/11) and the personal experiences and identities of those involved. The tone of the conversation is highly confrontational and includes personal attacks, which detracts from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @GaryMarcus does not strive to do no harm, as it includes derogatory language and personal attacks, which can be harmful.聽[-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it includes name-calling and insults.聽[-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it escalates the conflict and fosters animosity.聽[-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the substantive issues raised.聽[-2]