The statement appears to be a critical commentary on OpenAI's operational strategy, suggesting a repetitive cycle of announcing demos, releasing to limited users, raising money, and repeating the process. The tone is somewhat cynical and implies a critique of OpenAI's transparency and business practices.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of OpenAI's practices. It does not use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a critical view without offering constructive feedback or engaging in a dialogue with OpenAI. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique a prominent organization, which can be seen as an attempt to hold it accountable. However, it does not provide a balanced view or suggest improvements.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to voice a critique. However, it could be more responsible by providing a more balanced and constructive critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.