In reply to:
Max Kesin
@nlpnyc
·
243d
David Manheim ✈️ NYC Sep 19-22, (+UK Sep 17-18)
@davidmanheim
·
243d
The statement engages in a discussion about the potential risks and benefits of AI in scientific research, specifically addressing concerns about misinformation and the impact of large language models (LLMs) on the scientific community. The tone is critical and aims to clarify a perceived misrepresentation of the speaker's views. The intent is to contribute to the ongoing debate about the role of AI in science, emphasizing the need for evidence-based evaluation of its impact.
- The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a misrepresentation and focusing on the need for evidence-based discussion. This aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment. It addresses the issue at hand rather than targeting individuals, which aligns with respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by emphasizing the need for evidence and acknowledging that the issue remains open for further investigation. This aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point of contention and providing a reasoned argument. It avoids personal attacks and focuses on the issue, which aligns with engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.