In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
243d
The statement by @JadeCole2112 and the subsequent replies engage in a discussion about OpenAI's strategies and media interactions, which can be considered public discourse as it addresses public concerns about corporate transparency and media relations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual observation about OpenAI's media interactions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing additional information to the ongoing conversation. It does not involve personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public discussion about corporate practices. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.