In reply to:
Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh
@S_OhEigeartaigh
·
270d
The statement engages in a technical discussion about the capabilities and limitations of AI models, specifically focusing on the differences between scaling pure LLMs (Large Language Models) and incorporating additional techniques to achieve results that pure scaling alone cannot. The tone is analytical and aims to clarify a nuanced point in the ongoing conversation about AI development.
- The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on a technical clarification, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a technical point, which contributes to a more informed discussion about AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.