Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 48
9/12/2024, 6:20:52 PM
X
In reply to:
David Manheim ✈️ NYC Sep 19-22, (+UK Sep 17-18)
@davidmanheim
·
270d
@onteamhuman @GaryMarcus Perhaps in part because it was much easier for them to generate synthetic training data for math to test the model on then it is to generate novel coding problems with solutions?
⏹️
@onteamhuman
·
270d
@GaryMarcus It would be interesting to understand in more depth why the most important (perceived) improvements are in mathematics and somewhat less pronounced in coding
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
270d
Strawberry has landed. 𝗛𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗚𝗣𝗧'𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗼𝟭 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹:

It is definitely impressive.
BUT
0. It’s not AGI, or even close.
1. There’s not a lot of detail about how it actually works, nor anything like full disclosure of what has been tested.
2. It is not…
Noam Brown
@polynoamial
·
270d
Today, I’m excited to share with you all the fruit of our effort at @OpenAI to create AI models capable of truly general reasoning: OpenAI's new o1 model series! (aka 🍓) Let me explain 🧵 1/

The statement 'potentially a very good point' is a brief acknowledgment of a previous comment in a discussion about the advancements and testing of OpenAI's new model. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the model's performance in mathematics and coding, and the challenges in generating training data for these areas. The statement is supportive and adds a positive note to the ongoing dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is supportive, contributing positively to the discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the validity of a point made by another participant. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by recognizing a potentially valuable insight without resorting to personal attacks or negative criticism. [+1]