Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
302d
From the blog etc o1/strawberry is not a robust advance on general purpose reasoning.

Doesn’t sound like much of a cure for hallucinations or stupid errors, either.

A better ladder will not get us to the moon.

I want us to get to the moon.
9/12/2024, 8:05:57 PM
X

The statement 'e/acc wants us to build giant ladders as fast possible, no matter what the cost is to society. i want us to slow down and build proper starships. call me t/acc, for thoughtful acceleration.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the debate on the pace and direction of technological advancements, particularly in AI development. The tone is critical and suggests a preference for a more cautious and thoughtful approach to technological progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that the approach of 'e/acc' could be harmful to society. This is a critique rather than a harmful action.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques a group ('e/acc') but does so in a manner that respects their dignity.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by distinguishing between different approaches to technological progress ('e/acc' vs 't/acc'). It encourages a thoughtful discussion on the implications of rapid technological advancement.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of 'e/acc' without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the approach rather than individuals.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a more thoughtful and cautious approach to technological progress, which can be seen as beneficial to society.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in a meaningful debate about technological progress.