Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
9/12/2024, 8:15:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Pablo
@PeteyPabshnick
·
303d
@GaryMarcus honestly though, what's stopping you? the market will reward you if you're right
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
303d
e/acc wants us to build giant ladders as fast possible, no matter what the cost is to society.

i want us to slow down and build proper starships.

call me t/acc, for thoughtful acceleration.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
303d
From the blog etc o1/strawberry is not a robust advance on general purpose reasoning.

Doesn’t sound like much of a cure for hallucinations or stupid errors, either.

A better ladder will not get us to the moon.

I want us to get to the moon.

The statement by @PeteyPabshnick, 'the inability to raise a competitive amount of money from a VCs that are largely LLM-obsessed,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the broader debate on funding and priorities in the field of artificial intelligence, specifically in the context of large language models (LLMs) and their impact on societal progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does critique the current funding landscape, which could be seen as a constructive critique rather than harmful. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critique of a trend rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does raise a point that could lead to a more nuanced discussion about funding priorities.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the funding landscape without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By critiquing the current funding trends, the statement aims to influence the discourse towards a more balanced approach to AI development, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise a substantive issue about funding priorities in AI. [+1]