Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47

Score 117

Reposted by Gary Marcus

This. We can't prop up and scaffold this junk forever, and o1-preview currently isn't an improvement, o1-preview is often just going around in larger circles than what usually went on with gpt-4o. Also, no internet connectivity = outdated solutions and increased hallucinations.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

313d

Strawberry/o1 is a good example of how you take a shaky foundation and eke out improvements.

We need something different altogether, a new foundation that is more transparent, interpretable, and robust.

9/13/2024, 10:45:09 AM

The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the development and improvement of AI models, specifically addressing the limitations and potential issues with the current approach. This constitutes public discourse as it contributes to the civic dialogue on technological advancements and their implications.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It critiques the current state of AI development without using harmful language. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement aims to promote understanding by pointing out specific issues with the current AI model and suggesting the need for a new foundation. However, it could be more empathetic and compassionate in its tone. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI model and the approach taken, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]