Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the capabilities and limitations of OpenAI's new o1 model, contributing to the public discourse on AI technology. The tone is critical but not hostile, aiming to provide constructive feedback on the model's performance. The statement references another expert's opinion to support its argument, which adds credibility to the critique.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the technical aspects of the AI model rather than attacking individuals or organizations. It maintains a professional tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It focuses solely on the performance of the AI model.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a clear critique of the AI model's reasoning capabilities. It encourages further discussion and analysis, which can lead to improvements in the technology.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out specific issues with the AI model's reasoning steps. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the technical aspects.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.