In reply to:
Kat Woods ⏸️
@Kat__Woods
·
323d
Handika Wisnu
@handikawisnu
·
324d
The statement addresses the reliability of a new model, engaging in a discussion about its performance. The tone is critical but not hostile, aiming to provide a balanced view by mentioning both successes and failures.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a factual observation rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the model's performance rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging both successes and failures, contributing to a more nuanced discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism, addressing the model's reliability without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.