In reply to:
Kat Woods ⏸️
@Kat__Woods
·
325d
Handika Wisnu
@handikawisnu
·
326d
The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities and limitations of AI models, specifically in the context of their performance on tasks like letter counting and playing games like tic-tac-toe and chess. The tone is critical and aims to provide a counterpoint to the previous optimistic claims about the AI's abilities.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a critique of technology rather than individuals.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the AI's performance rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing specific examples of where the AI has failed, contributing to a more nuanced view of its capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism, addressing the disagreement with specific evidence rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.