In reply to:
🌹#PortiaABoulger
@PortiaABoulger
·
127d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
127d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the political landscape and the actions taken to influence the outcome of a presidential election. The tone is defensive and assertive, aiming to justify the speaker's actions in the political arena.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the defensive tone could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does attempt to clarify the speaker's actions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue but does not offer constructive criticism or avoid personal attacks, as it is somewhat defensive and dismissive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on defending past actions.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to justify their actions for the betterment of society, specifically in the context of preventing Donald Trump from being re-elected. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though the tone could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.