Marianne Williamson

Rank 7 of 47
|
Score 193
In reply to:

The statement by @sarah_luna_1111 addresses the degradation of public discourse and the impact of 'language police' on both sides of the political spectrum. It engages with a broader societal issue concerning the quality and nature of public conversation, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but criticizes the current state of public discourse, which can be seen as an attempt to improve it. This aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the issue of degraded conversation and the role of 'language police.' However, it could be seen as lacking in empathy and compassion towards those who feel the need to police language.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current state of public discourse and does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss an important societal issue responsibly. [+1]