Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the performance of OpenAI's language model (LLM) on a classic river crossing puzzle, suggesting that despite efforts to improve, the model still struggles with such problems. The statement implies a broader concern about the model's ability to solve unknown problems, which is a significant issue in AI development.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a constructive critique of the AI's capabilities. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing on the AI's performance rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a specific issue with the AI's problem-solving abilities, encouraging further discussion and improvement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism, addressing a specific shortcoming of the AI without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant issue in AI development, potentially contributing to the betterment of AI technology and its applications. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.