Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 55
9/14/2024, 1:16:52 AM
X
In reply to:
Tess Hegarty 🔸
@thegartsy
·
350d
@DrMikeBrooks @GaryMarcus @gleonhard I think wisdom is the key framing. I think Transformer has a pretty straightforward summary of how to frame the latest release from a safety perspective.

But also curious what Gary thinks too :)

Link here:
https://www.transformernews.ai/p…
Mike Brooks
@DrMikeBrooks
·
350d
@GaryMarcus @gleonhard Gary, I trust YOU to give us the straight dope on this - has your concern level increased with OpenAI’s new model? Jeez, I don’t think real safety measures will be attempted until…something bad happens. Right now, it’s a mad race to…perhaps the bottom. We need to be wiser.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
351d
⚠️What’s below is not a joke, and not a drill. Sam Altman can do whatever he wants, with almost no liability, and no oversight, internal or external, even if it puts humanity at risk.

⚠️No unelected leader should have that power.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
351d
hey everybody, we might increase the chance that you or a loved one might die in a biological weapons attack, but don’t sweat it … because ... we only make it available to paid subscribers.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the potential risks associated with new AI technologies and suggesting the need for regulatory oversight similar to the FDA. The tone is cautious and concerned, aiming to promote a discussion on safety and regulation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks and advocating for safety measures. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the potential dangers and the need for regulatory oversight. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a solution (FDA-like approval process) rather than merely criticizing the current state of affairs. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for increased safety measures and regulatory oversight. [+2]