Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the potential risks associated with new AI technologies and suggesting the need for regulatory oversight similar to the FDA. The tone is cautious and concerned, aiming to promote a discussion on safety and regulation.
- The statement strives to do no harm by raising awareness about potential risks and advocating for safety measures. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the complexity of the issue and the uncertainty involved. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a potential solution (FDA-like approval process) without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for the betterment of society by calling for regulatory measures to ensure safety. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.