In reply to:
Andy Even
@andyeven
·
489d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
489d
The statement by @andyeven addresses the issue of crowdsourcing for content moderation, particularly in the context of Community Notes, and responds to concerns about partisan censorship. The tone is constructive and suggests a potential solution to a public issue, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and suggests a constructive approach to content moderation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting a collaborative approach to content moderation, which can be seen as a way to foster a more inclusive and fair online environment. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a concern and proposing a solution without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By suggesting a method to improve content moderation, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society, aiming to create a more reliable and less biased system. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of the platform by discussing ways to improve content moderation without infringing on individual freedoms. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.