In reply to:
Anthony Leverrier
@letonyo
·
490d
Michael Nielsen
@michael_nielsen
·
490d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the capabilities of AI in mathematics, referencing public figures and their opinions on the matter. The tone is somewhat dismissive and competitive, particularly towards a 'grad student' and Tao, which could be seen as undermining the principles of respectful and constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses a grad student as 'incompetent' and implies that Tao would not join a bet once he reads it, which could be seen as belittling. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly the grad student referred to as 'incompetent,' which could be considered a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters a competitive and dismissive tone. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It includes a personal attack on the grad student and a dismissive remark about Tao, rather than focusing on the substantive issue of AI's capabilities in mathematics. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.