In reply to:
Leo 🔎🛡️⏸️🌐
@Leoagua1
·
490d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the performance and evaluation of large language models (LLMs), specifically addressing concerns about the robustness and reliability of their results. The tone is critical but focused on providing evidence and examples to support the argument.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the performance of LLMs rather than attacking individuals. It maintains a critical but respectful tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing specific examples and acknowledging the complexity of evaluating LLM performance. It encourages a deeper look into the training data and benchmarks used. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific issues with the performance of LLMs and providing evidence to support the claims. It avoids personal attacks and focuses on the subject matter. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.