In reply to:
@jason
@Jason
·
492d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
492d
The statement engages in a discussion about the motivations behind violent actions against a public figure, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat skeptical, aiming to question the validity of claims about the shooters' political motivations.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but rather seeks clarification, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by questioning the basis of a claim, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in a substantive public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.