Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
9/16/2024, 12:35:22 AM
X
In reply to:
@jason
@Jason
·
492d
@GaryMarcus I guess we will have to wait for the investigations to conclude, but in the meantime we can all agree that toning down violent rhetoric is a good idea.

Hope you’re having a wonderful Sunday Gary ☮️ 🌈
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
492d
@Jason Is there something we know about either shooter that is consistent with either being on the left and attempting to shoot Trump because of allegations that he was a Nazi? Aside from a $20 donation when one was in high school? anything at all?
@jason
@Jason
·
492d
@GaryMarcus I’m speaking about the big picture — obviously we know little to nothing about this shooter.

Hope you’re well Gary.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
492d
@Jason Shocked that you would say this. It is false:
@jason
@Jason
·
492d
If you call someone Hitler over and over again, or tell folks to “fight like hell” or you won’t have a country, you are signaling to the craziest partisans to start a civil war.

That’s why they’ve tried to kill Trump twice, and that’s why they rioted and brought long guns to…

The statement by @Jason constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the investigation of shooters and their potential political motives. The conversation addresses societal concerns about violent rhetoric and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does discuss sensitive topics that could be inflammatory if not handled carefully. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a neutral tone and does not target individuals personally. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on discussing the facts and potential political affiliations of the shooters.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking questions and seeking clarification. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public discussion without resorting to inflammatory language. [+1]