In reply to:
@jason
@Jason
·
492d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
492d
The statement by @Jason constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the rhetoric surrounding political figures and its potential consequences. The reply by @GaryMarcus and the subsequent clarification by @Jason also contribute to this discourse.
- The statement by @Jason acknowledges a mistake and expresses an intention to correct it, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by appreciating the clarification and showing willingness to adjust comments accordingly. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement explicitly acknowledges a mistake and expresses an intention to correct it, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.