The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the interpretation of a statement related to political violence and the clarification of a potentially inflammatory comment. The tone is reflective and corrective, aiming to clarify a misunderstanding and acknowledge a mistake.
- The statement strives to do no harm by deleting potentially harmful tweets and clarifying the misunderstanding, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and instead focuses on clarification. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by appreciating the clarification and acknowledging the nuanced point made by @Jason. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the misunderstanding directly and not resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake by deleting the tweets and appreciating the clarification. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by correcting the record and promoting a more accurate understanding of the issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.