Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement expresses concern about a perceived call for violence and criticizes the platform's response to a report of hateful conduct. The tone is serious and accusatory, aiming to highlight issues of platform moderation and the potential for incitement of violence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by calling out a perceived threat and reporting it, although it uses strong language ('f’d up') which could be seen as inflammatory. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not revealing personal information but accuses a public figure of inciting violence, which could be seen as a serious allegation. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the issue of platform moderation and the potential dangers of incitement, although it could be more constructive in its language. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the platform's moderation policies but could avoid personal attacks by focusing more on the issue rather than individuals.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a significant issue, aiming to improve platform policies and public safety. [+1]