In reply to:
The statement 'Why is right on left violence ok here, @KettlebellDan?' is a response to a conversation about a reported tweet that was deemed not to violate platform rules. The statement questions the perceived acceptance of violence from one political side against another, implying a double standard. The tone is accusatory and seeks to highlight perceived bias or inconsistency in the enforcement of rules against hateful conduct.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but questions the perceived acceptance of harm, which can be seen as striving to do no harm indirectly. However, the accusatory tone may not contribute positively to the discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to a hostile environment by framing the issue in terms of political violence, which may not promote dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it highlights division and perceived bias.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a way that could be seen as confrontational rather than constructive. It does not engage in personal attacks but implies a negative judgment about the platform's rule enforcement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.