Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement 'Why is right on left violence ok here, @KettlebellDan?' is a response to a conversation about a reported tweet that was deemed not to violate platform rules. The statement questions the perceived acceptance of violence from one political side against another, implying a double standard. The tone is accusatory and seeks to highlight perceived bias or inconsistency in the enforcement of rules against hateful conduct.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite violence or harm, but it does address the issue of violence, which is a sensitive topic. It could be seen as contributing to a polarized discourse rather than promoting peace and understanding. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of individuals involved but engages in a public debate about the enforcement of rules on a social media platform. It does not engage in cyberbullying or harassment directly but could be seen as part of a broader contentious dialogue.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it highlights a perceived injustice or bias, which can be important but is done in a confrontational manner. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not do so constructively. It questions the actions of a specific individual (@KettlebellDan) without providing a constructive path forward or engaging in a dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to address a societal issue (perceived bias in rule enforcement), which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the confrontational tone may undermine this goal. [+1]